Aurality as central to radio theory (and radio drama theory)

The ears have it.

(Alan Beck's term) Part of core theory for radio. 'Aurality', matches film's 'specularity'.

It has three aspects: the 'listening-to-ness' of radio reception, the 'heard-of-ness' of the broadcast speaker and other sound events on radio, and listening in itself.

It is the monaural medium that makes radio drama aesthetically unique.

See Aural Paradise

See Oculocentrism or ocularocentrism - dominance of seeing in our senses

1857 Phonautograph of Édouard-Léon Scott de Martinville

See http://people.deas.harvard.edu/%7Ejones/cscie129/images/snd_vis/snd_vis.html

See also Alexander Graham Bell's Path to the Telephone at http://www3.iath.virginia.edu/albell/homepage.html

Bell's Ear Mental Model. See http://repo-nt.tcc.virginia.edu/book/chap3/chapter3sec7.html

 

Alan Beck: There is what I have newly termed 'aurality', to match film's 'specularity' and painting's 'opticality', noting that radio is a one-modality medium. Aurality has three aspects: (1) the 'listening-to-ness' of radio reception, (2) the 'heard-of-ness' of the broadcast talker or performer and other sound events on radio, and (3) listening in itself: the 'listening that - ' and the 'listening how - '. I link radio's multiple codes of communicating with reception theory and I hope to reverse oculocentrist tendencies (chapter 4), that is the tendency to think and theorize visually about sound. I wish to shift theoretical attention instead to the aural in itself, which has been somewhat neglected in media theory, and theory of the sight/sound media overall. We regularly use 'visualist' metaphors in describing our reception of broadcast radio and indeed, as listeners, we process aural data across sense modalities. In other words, when we listen to radio, we may 'see', 'feel', 'smell' and 'touch' also, in our minds. I consider optic ('visual') and haptic ('touching', with depth and perspective) aspects of aural processing. In what phenomenologists have to offer about the human sensorium, I would favour the internalists, that is, those who do not consider the perceptual array as modular but as interpenetrating. Aurality is not a unified theory, but it is inclusive and a centre, and it is a stance towards the problem of 'What is radio?' - an exploration into multidimensional phenomena demanding different research projects. (4) The inclusive theory centre here in this book is my concept of aurality, the 'listening-to-ness' of the audience, the 'heard-of-ness' of radio's performers and listening in itself. This links radio text (or radio event), context and reception. It is in tension with another emphasis of mine, the hybridity of radio, its intertextuality and its ability to defy its autonomy, that is, centripetal aspects of radio which resist inclusive theory-building on my part.   See Alan Beck's Key Theories on Radio and Sound

 

 

 

 

 

This site is 'Radio Drama - directing, acting, technical, learning & teaching, researching, styles, genres'. See INDEX to navigate also.  Complete curriculum of scripts, techniques (acting & directing & post-production & genre styles), advice, sound files - effects and atmoses (with no copyright and so free to use), detailed script commentaries, etc. TECHNIQUES - FULL RANGE OF RADIO DRAMA TECHNIQUES ON THESE SITES Academic material on this site is Alan Beck is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Learn about radio drama on this site along with my book - Beck, Alan, Radio Acting, London: A & C Black ISBN 0-7136-4631-4 Available on Amazon. CLICK HERE. To the WELCOME PAGE for Alan Beck's sites. See more of Alan Beck's work. Disclaimer Any opinions expressed in this site are the personal opinions of the owner of the site. IF YOU HAVE COMMENTS, PLEASE EMAIL TO : [email protected]