Radio does not employ enough terms for discussing itself
Our vocabulary strains at detailing and discussing all the sound events and their activity. Our present list of available terms only gets to a small percentage of what comes in to our ears. Sound takes a back seat to film in this. Reviews of films can use some complicated terms. It's urgent that sound catches up! THE EYES HAVE IT! We are in constant contact with the SOUND WORLD - we are surrounded by it. We are held back by our lack of sensitivity to sound. We have to be more inquisitive about sound and talk more about it. Academic study of sound has not got to the stage yet of fully mapping the area. There is not enough of a disciplinary focus across academic institutions. See the 'RADIO DRAMA BIBLIOGRAPHY' for some marvellous contributions to sound and its vocabulary at http://www.savoyhill.co.uk/technique/radiodramabibliography.html
The the visual is prioritized in everyday experience. See 'Oculocentrism or ocularocentrism - dominance of seeing in our senses'
at http://www.savoyhill.co.uk/technique/oculocentrism%20.html
There are dangers in visually-based theoretical terms. See 'Oculocentrism or ocularocentrism - dominance of seeing in our senses'
at http://www.savoyhill.co.uk/technique/oculocentrism%20.html
See 'Listening - how people listen' at http://www.savoyhill.co.uk/technique/listening.html Academic (theoretical) terms belong to only one possible system and this operates ONLY on its own terms. See 'Radio theory - what is it for?' at http://www.savoyhill.co.uk/technique/radiotheorywhatisitfor.html
and 'Theory - what is it?' at http://www.savoyhill.co.uk/technique/theory.html
Alan Beck's discussion of this
SOURCE:
Beck, Alan, 2000, 'Playing by ear: new ways of teaching and researching radio drama', Studies in Theatre and Performance online, December 2000, electronic publication,
http://www.ukc.ac.uk/sdfva/stp/index.html
3.3 Extending the vocabulary
Radio, overall, is still under-theorised (Lewis and Booth, 1989, xii-xiii and 3), and needs to draw on other disciplines, film especially in my opinion. I describe film as 'radio drama's significant other'. My preference among the all-too-few current theorists in film sound is for Michel Chion (Chion 1994; Crook, 1999, 70, 81-9), Edward Brannigan, Murray Smith and Gianluca Sergi. (A reading list is available on the Radio Theory site.) Many radio drama listeners have their aural skills refined in the cinema, as I outlined above.
Further, as I touched on above, radio has not a descriptive, critical, artistic and theoretical vocabulary as evolved and precise for its many tasks as we would wish it. The complaint goes back to Arnheim, 1936, 17. Sergi 1998 starts his study of film sound with a regret about 'the lack of a proper vocabulary with which to articulate the complexity of the subject' (156). Elissa Guralnick explains that in her study of Beckett, Stoppard, Pinter, etc., '[I] have made little mention of so-called production values - sound effects, background music, electronic filters for noises and voices, and the like' (Guralnick, 1996, xi).
Radio itself was never part of that 1980s theoretical explosion which drove film, for example, into work on subject and object. Crook's chapter, 'Sound design vocabulary', gives an effective collection to date, with commentary (Crook, 1999, 70-89). I introduce or adapt some terms myself, given in the Glossary.
Examples are the 'extra-radio world' corresponding to film's 'profilmic event' or 'profilmic object', that is, the world out there at which the microphone points. Also there is the radio 'mise en scène', well-known in theatre scenography and even more widely applied in film studies (Beck, 2000, 'Mise en scène'). I transpose from film theory the term 'suturing devices'. Their purpose is to 'stitch in' or 'bind in' and position the listener. They make up for radio's 'absence' (Crisell, 1994, 56). I hope these terms will be found meaningful in future work but the aim must be overall, to produce on the page, as detailed an analysis of key radio play scenes as one finds in film studies.
SEE http://www.savoyhill.co.uk/technique/radiodramabibliography.html for bibliography.
SEE GLOSSARY FOR THIS ARTICLE at http://www.kent.ac.uk/sdfva/stp/index.htmlSEE ALSO the GLOSSARY for the 'RADIO DRAMA DIRECTING SITE' at http://www.savoyhill.co.uk/technique/glossary.html
See also Thomas Leitch, 'Twelve fallacies in contemporary adaptation theory', Criticism, Spring, 2003
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2220/is_2_45/ai_n6143332/pg_1